4-4-2012 The Weekly Claw

None of the serious weather came close to Casa Crustacean, nor my workplace. We are thankful that none of our family and friends have reported injuries or damage. We also thank God that there have been no reported fatalities from yesterday’s storms. Unfortunately for my readers, other events around here have caused me to be quite tired and have a lack of material for this week. You’ll get over it.

A) There is a reason why the GOP gets saddled with liberal “establishment” nominees every four years. Notice how many liberal states are stacked early in the primary season. Almost every state that Mitt Romney has won is a state that voted for Barack Obama in 2008. If the RED states dominated the first half of the primaries, Mitt Romney would have been eliminated long ago.

B) “Ultimately, I am confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.” That drivel came from the oral sewer of our wanna-be dictator, the supposed Constitutional law expert, Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama. First of all, the Supreme Court is SUPPOSED to overturn laws that are anti-Constitutional, and they do it all the time, so it would hardly be unprecedented. Secondly, it was not passed by any strong majority. It was passed by the slimmest of margins, and even then only after bribes had been handed out to a number of Democrat House members. He went on to say that overturning such a ruling would be “judicial activism”: “And I'd just remind conservative commentators that, for years, what we have heard is, the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism, or a lack of judicial restraint, that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law, Well, this is a good example, and I'm pretty confident that this court will recognize that and not take that step.” Sorry, moron, but “judicial activism” is when the courts make new law or allow anti-Constitutional law to stand. If this Court overturns Obamacare, they are doing their Constitutional duty. Since Marbury v. Madison is one of the first case studies in any Constitutional Law class, and that case established the concept of “judicial review”, we now have proof that Barack Obama never really took any such classes.

C) His Majesty’s staff must have realized that He had stepped in it, since he tried to re-nuance his remarks and make them a bit more palatable while still telling SCOTUS that it is their job to rubber stamp his anti-Constitutional achievement.

D) A 3-judge panel from the 5th Circuit also took note of King Barack’s pronouncements regarding the judiciary. They are hearing another case regarding Obamacare, but not part of the current SCOTUS case. The panel ordered the Justice Department to produce a 3-page, single-spaced response to Obama’s edicts to be turned in to them by noon on Thursday. Judge Jerry Smith had the following quotes from the hearing: “Does the Department of Justice recognize that federal courts have the authority in appropriate circumstances to strike federal statutes because of one or more constitutional infirmities?” and “referring to statements by the president in the past few days to the effect ... that it is somehow inappropriate for what he termed unelected judges to strike acts of Congress. That has troubled a number of people who have read it as somehow a challenge to the federal courts or to their authority. And that's not a small matter.” Obama has repeatedly thrown down the gauntlet, and it appears that some of the judiciary has now had enough of his disrespect.

E) So what has the longtime spiritual adviser to the Obama family been up to these days? He has been continuing his anti-semetic ways that he was famous for while the Obama family sat on the front row for 20 years. Does anybody really believe that Barry privately disagrees with anything Reverend Wrong does? If he has any repudiating response, it will be for the media and dope-and-changers who will believe anything he says, but if he thought he could get away with it he would join Reverend Wrong in his endorsement.

F) Here’s what one of his major political influences has been up to. Admitted-terrorist Bill Ayers says he gets up every morning thinking “today I'm gonna make a difference. Today I'm gonna end capitalism. Today I'm gonna make a revolution. I go to bed every night disappointed, but I'm back again tomorrow. That's the only way you can do it.”

G) As if any of my readers need this refresher, Barack Obama came out and repeated his ruling philosophy. According to him, GOVERNMENT is what has made our nation great. The fact that the American media didn’t immediately turn him into a laughingstock just shows how they are on his side.

"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it." --Thomas Jefferson

The Constitution of the United States

Follow me on Facebook.